President Obama will give a State of the Union address tomorrow, Tuesday, night. I will not watch his address.
All day tomorrow the media "experts" will tell me what they think he is going to say.
Then, on Wednesday, these so-called "experts" will tell me what he said.
With such coverage, why should I listen?
Monday, January 27, 2014
Monday, January 06, 2014
Voter ID
The NC Legislature, in its infinite wisdom, has created yet another totally unnecessary problem. This time it's voter ID.
The new law, which is scheduled to go into effect beginning in 2016, will require all potential voters to present an acceptable photo ID. Therein lies the problem. The new law requires that photo ID must contain the "Full" name, and it must match the name on the voter registration books.
What is the "Full" name? Normally we would define this as first name, middle name and last name. But, what about a married woman? What is her "Full" name?
Here is a hypothetical situation. Mary Ann Jones registers to vote as soon as she is eligible. Then she marries Joe Smith. Now what is her "Full" name? Is it Mary Ann Smith or Mary Jones Smith. More important, in order to vote she must present a photo ID, such as a driver's license. What name is on the photo ID? She registered to vote as Mary Ann Jones. When she renewed her driver's license after she married, she changed the name to Mary Ann Smith. It no longer matches the registration books, so, by the law, she is not eligible to vote. Does she know this?
Even more fun would occur if she decided to hyphenate her name, and become Mary Ann Jones-Smith. If she changes her photo ID then the names will not match.
My wife and I discovered this problem, when she realized the name on her military ID card was different from that on her driver's license and what was on the registration books. To be sure, she had to change the name on the registration book to match her ID. But, how many other people will think to do this?
The voter ID act is supposedly to eliminate voter fraud which is minuscule in NC. So, the legislature has concocted a stupid solution to a problem that really doesn't exist. But, that's our legislature!
The new law, which is scheduled to go into effect beginning in 2016, will require all potential voters to present an acceptable photo ID. Therein lies the problem. The new law requires that photo ID must contain the "Full" name, and it must match the name on the voter registration books.
What is the "Full" name? Normally we would define this as first name, middle name and last name. But, what about a married woman? What is her "Full" name?
Here is a hypothetical situation. Mary Ann Jones registers to vote as soon as she is eligible. Then she marries Joe Smith. Now what is her "Full" name? Is it Mary Ann Smith or Mary Jones Smith. More important, in order to vote she must present a photo ID, such as a driver's license. What name is on the photo ID? She registered to vote as Mary Ann Jones. When she renewed her driver's license after she married, she changed the name to Mary Ann Smith. It no longer matches the registration books, so, by the law, she is not eligible to vote. Does she know this?
Even more fun would occur if she decided to hyphenate her name, and become Mary Ann Jones-Smith. If she changes her photo ID then the names will not match.
My wife and I discovered this problem, when she realized the name on her military ID card was different from that on her driver's license and what was on the registration books. To be sure, she had to change the name on the registration book to match her ID. But, how many other people will think to do this?
The voter ID act is supposedly to eliminate voter fraud which is minuscule in NC. So, the legislature has concocted a stupid solution to a problem that really doesn't exist. But, that's our legislature!
Friday, October 18, 2013
The Republican political platform
After much study and deliberation, I think I have finally
deciphered exactly what the “dingbats” propose as their platform to govern the
world. While this is rather complicated,
I have summarized it in order to spell out the most important planks.
ECONOMICS: The dingbats don’t actually believe in any
accepted economic theory, except for their one guiding principle. That is expressed as “Trickle Down.” If big business, big banks, and very rich
people are allowed to operate without any form of regulation or restriction,
then they will make scads of money. Eventually,
although really not necessary, some of this will trickle down to the working
class. (Note: the dingbats would really
like to do away with the entire working class, as thee people make a lot of
noise demanding food, shelter and other minimal necessities of life. However, the dingbats realize that they
cannot totally eliminate this class.
After all, somebody has to clean house, mow the lawn and tend the flower
gardens.) We have seen evidence that the “trickle down theory of economics”
does work, at least for the working classes in China, India, Vietnam, etc. This is where the wealthy dingbats have moved
their businesses in order to make even more scads of money.
WOMEN: The dingbat’s
program is simple. “Woman’s place is in
the kitchen, and she should go there immediately after returning from
work.” Being barefoot and pregnant is
optional. The man of the house will make all decisions.
EDUCATION: Extensive education for the masses is totally
unnecessary. For the working classes, a
minimal ability to read, write and do a few sums is all that is required. For the limited middle class that will be
necessary to run the grocery stores, dress shops and other such amenities
important to the elite, a couple years more should suffice. For the children of the elite, of course,
higher education is required to polish their social skills. This will be in private schools, preferably
those with some religious affiliation. This will be funded via a voucher
system. However, this is certainly not
to be considered an entitlement, but more a necessity to insure that the
leaders for the future have the proper foundations.
MINORITIES: Afro Americans and Hispanics are expected to
work in the fields, picking cotton, harvesting grapes or other necessary menial
labor. A great part of this labor will be devoted to completing the massive
fence along our border with Mexico. All Hispanics lacking the “proper” proof of
citizenship will be immediately deported.
VOTING: In general, only the elite (those with some
established income level and/or position of importance) will have voting
rights. Preferably voting should be
restricted to males, as they are the only persons with the necessary
understanding of the complexities involved, but exceptions will be made to
accommodate those females with sufficient income or position. Also, a minimal number of the middle class
will be granted this privilege, but only white males who own property.
TAXES: All taxes, local, state and federal, will be held to
the absolute minimum, especially to those of the elite. The bulk of tax revenue must come from the
middle and working classes. If this does not generate enough revenue to
maintain the essential government services, then other means of revenue will be
found.
GOVERNMENT: Ideally, there should be only a minimum of
government. There are certain functions,
such as fire and police protection, that are necessary to protect the person
and property of the elite. But, many of
the other departments and operations should be abolished. The fact that this will cause many thousand
to suddenly become unemployed does not seem to be a determining factor.
HEALTH CARE: The dingbats are fiercely against the
Affordable Care Act. They will do almost
anything to abolish it. But, they have
yet to say what they want to replace it.
Apparently they believe that nothing is required. They, the elite, all have great medical
insurance, so they don’t have to worry about this. For all the rest, tough!
Medicare and Medicaid are too expensive for the minimum remaining government to
support, so anyone who cannot afford the outrageous policies now available also
cannot go to the emergency rooms, as that is a tax burden. Maybe they should just die by the side of the
road.
NATIONAL DEBT: Not a problem. We’ll just default and tell all our creditors
“tough!” After all, we would have to extract more tax revenue from the elite in
order to pay down the debt. That is a no-no!
ARMED FORCES: We must
have a strong Army! However, this poses
a problem. Armies and Navies, Air Forces, Marines etc. are expensive to maintain. One solution might
be to re-institute the draft. As
government activities are shut down all over America, there will be thousands
out of work. Many of these will be young
and fit enough to serve as perpetual Privates. There will be no promotions as
that would increase the cost. But, after all, our need will be for cannon
fodder. Leadership will come from the
elite.
GOVERNMENT SPENDING:
This must be reduced drastically.
Nothing is sacred. Everything
must be cut, except, of course, for those pet projects by various members of
congress necessary to ensure their reelection.
These will be funded, financed by some source of revenue not yet determined.
If you think all this sounds totally preposterous then you
haven’t been paying attention. Listen to what is being said at the dingbat
fund-raisers, where they are talking to their loyal followers. It is frightening!
Monday, September 30, 2013
Restrictions on voting
The "dingbats" in the NC Legislature passed their voting restriction bill, claiming it was designed to stamp out voter fraud. The trouble is they can't show very much voter fraud. The new law ignores much of what voter fraud exists. It totally ignores absentee ballots. This is a shame. I was really looking forward to showing my required picture ID card to the mailman when she delivered my absentee ballot.
There is nothing in the totally useless law to prevent me from voting absentee in another state, and in person here.
But, the new law also creates a problem, especially for women. For example, I am retired military. My wife has a dependent military ID card. Her name on that card is her first name, maiden name and my name. However, her name on her NC driver's license is first name, middle initial and last name. That is also the way she is listed on the voter roles. So, since a military ID card is an accepted form of identification for voting, she will use that when she votes. It will be very interesting if a poll clerk tries to prevent her from voting because that is not the name on the voter roles.
However, many women might face similar problems, since they often change their names when they marry or divorce, or sometimes hyphenate their names. If the "dingbats" try to impose the very tight name security that the claim is necessary to prevent voter fraud, then we may see some real fireworks.
There is nothing in the totally useless law to prevent me from voting absentee in another state, and in person here.
But, the new law also creates a problem, especially for women. For example, I am retired military. My wife has a dependent military ID card. Her name on that card is her first name, maiden name and my name. However, her name on her NC driver's license is first name, middle initial and last name. That is also the way she is listed on the voter roles. So, since a military ID card is an accepted form of identification for voting, she will use that when she votes. It will be very interesting if a poll clerk tries to prevent her from voting because that is not the name on the voter roles.
However, many women might face similar problems, since they often change their names when they marry or divorce, or sometimes hyphenate their names. If the "dingbats" try to impose the very tight name security that the claim is necessary to prevent voter fraud, then we may see some real fireworks.
GO GREEN
RECYCLE the LEGISLATURE
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Restrictions on voting
The "dingbats". in their zeal to ensure that only the "right" people will vote, have created a monster that will most probably rise up and bite them.
In their effort to prevent college students (who tend to be rather liberal) from having equal access to the polls, the "dingbats" have decreed that such students should not be allowed to vote where they attend college because that is only a "temporary" residence. According to the "dingbat" logic, such students should be required to return to their parents' home, and vote in that precinct.
This is so dumb! The "dingbats" are too dense to realize that many college students are married, and have an apartment or house where they attend college. This is most certainly their permanent residence. Would you have them return to their parents' home!
There is another interesting implication involved. I spent many years in the US Navy, where I was transferred to a new duty station every 2-3 years. My wife always registered and voted wherever we happened to be stationed. That was as permanent residence as we were going to have until my retirement. I would have loved to see some "dingbat" politician try to tell my wife she couldn't vote because we were only "temporary" residents. Carried to its logical conclusion, such a rule could affect thousands of military personnel.
If they really try to enforce this ridiculous legislation, the monster will bite.
In their effort to prevent college students (who tend to be rather liberal) from having equal access to the polls, the "dingbats" have decreed that such students should not be allowed to vote where they attend college because that is only a "temporary" residence. According to the "dingbat" logic, such students should be required to return to their parents' home, and vote in that precinct.
This is so dumb! The "dingbats" are too dense to realize that many college students are married, and have an apartment or house where they attend college. This is most certainly their permanent residence. Would you have them return to their parents' home!
There is another interesting implication involved. I spent many years in the US Navy, where I was transferred to a new duty station every 2-3 years. My wife always registered and voted wherever we happened to be stationed. That was as permanent residence as we were going to have until my retirement. I would have loved to see some "dingbat" politician try to tell my wife she couldn't vote because we were only "temporary" residents. Carried to its logical conclusion, such a rule could affect thousands of military personnel.
If they really try to enforce this ridiculous legislation, the monster will bite.
GO GREEN
RECYCLE THE LEGISLATURE
Labels:
dingbat stuidity,
voting restrictions
Thursday, August 01, 2013
Voter ID
The NC Legislature is hell-bent to make it difficult for the "wrong" people to vote. Who are the "wrong" people? Anybody who does not vote the dingbat ticket.
They want to eliminate most early voting; Sunday voting; one-stop voting etc. These are the procedures that make it much more convenient for the "wrong" people to vote. So, in the dingbat philosophy, these must be curtailed.
Probably the most stupid change is the requirement for some sort of a government issued, authorized, vetted picture ID. They haven't figured out exactly where and how one is supposed to get one of these magical IDs, but then they don't worry about this small technicality, because if the "wrong" people don't have the right ID card, then they can't vote. TA-DAH! Mission accomplished.
There is one truly idiotic bent to this legislation. Studies have shown that one of the major causes of voter fraud (of which there is very little) involves absentee ballots. The dingbats haven't explained just how this is supposed to work. Do I have to show my ID card to the mailman when he delivers my ballot, or when I mail in the ballot? This is very important, and must be clarified.
Just exactly how is this unnecessary requirement supposed to stop me from voting absentee in one state, and in person in another state? Come on, dingbats, Americans want to know.
They want to eliminate most early voting; Sunday voting; one-stop voting etc. These are the procedures that make it much more convenient for the "wrong" people to vote. So, in the dingbat philosophy, these must be curtailed.
Probably the most stupid change is the requirement for some sort of a government issued, authorized, vetted picture ID. They haven't figured out exactly where and how one is supposed to get one of these magical IDs, but then they don't worry about this small technicality, because if the "wrong" people don't have the right ID card, then they can't vote. TA-DAH! Mission accomplished.
There is one truly idiotic bent to this legislation. Studies have shown that one of the major causes of voter fraud (of which there is very little) involves absentee ballots. The dingbats haven't explained just how this is supposed to work. Do I have to show my ID card to the mailman when he delivers my ballot, or when I mail in the ballot? This is very important, and must be clarified.
Just exactly how is this unnecessary requirement supposed to stop me from voting absentee in one state, and in person in another state? Come on, dingbats, Americans want to know.
GO GREEN. RECYCLE the LEGISLATURE.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
A "Wacky" Ledgisture
My older brother lives in Oklahoma City. For many years, I have teased him about how Oklahoma always seems to have a truly weird bunch of "Wackos" in their state legislature.
Now the tables have been turned. North Carolina has surged to the front, and now there is no longer any argument. We now hold the title!
It is amazing how this turn-about has occurred in such a short time. North Carolina used to be a rather respectable state. Now we are the laughing stock of the nation.
It is difficult to enumerate all the weird things the "dingbat" controlled legislature has done. But with much effort, I have condensed what seems to be their political agenda down to two items.
First on the economic front: Cut taxes on the rich, in particular big business. Reduce all regulations, so big business can make an obscene amount of money. This eventually will "trickle down" to the lower classes, and all will be just wonderful. Part of this is true. Yes, the good times will trickle down, but to the working classes in China, India or Bangladesh. We have previously proved that this pie-in-the-sky sky doesn't work in America. But the dingbats keep trying.
Second, on the role of women: This one is easy. According to the dingbat philosophy, "Woman's place is in the kitchen, and she should go there as soon as she comes home from work." One of these days, the women of America are going to wake up and organize, and then the dingbats are going to be sleeping on the couch.
GO GREEN
RECYCLE the LEGISLATURE.
Now the tables have been turned. North Carolina has surged to the front, and now there is no longer any argument. We now hold the title!
It is amazing how this turn-about has occurred in such a short time. North Carolina used to be a rather respectable state. Now we are the laughing stock of the nation.
It is difficult to enumerate all the weird things the "dingbat" controlled legislature has done. But with much effort, I have condensed what seems to be their political agenda down to two items.
First on the economic front: Cut taxes on the rich, in particular big business. Reduce all regulations, so big business can make an obscene amount of money. This eventually will "trickle down" to the lower classes, and all will be just wonderful. Part of this is true. Yes, the good times will trickle down, but to the working classes in China, India or Bangladesh. We have previously proved that this pie-in-the-sky sky doesn't work in America. But the dingbats keep trying.
Second, on the role of women: This one is easy. According to the dingbat philosophy, "Woman's place is in the kitchen, and she should go there as soon as she comes home from work." One of these days, the women of America are going to wake up and organize, and then the dingbats are going to be sleeping on the couch.
GO GREEN
RECYCLE the LEGISLATURE.
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Gunfight at the Old Well!
Sometimes it is hard to accept the fact that many dingbat legislators don't have the sense God gave a goose. They tend to emphasize their lack of common sense on a daily basis.
Their latest example of stupidity? Together with the NRA, they want to allow concealed weapons on college campuses. It is extremely difficult to imagine a more stupid idea. They actually want to allow young college students, who are already prone to too much booze and dope, to have lethal weapons available.
Talk about a recipe for immediate chaos!
I can see the headlines in the Daily Tarheel: Gunfight at the Old Well. 2:00 PM every afternoon, M-F. . Come early, bring a blanket or a beach chair.
Note: The university is not responsible for accidental gun wounds to the spectators.
GO GREEN! RECYCLE CONGRESS!
Their latest example of stupidity? Together with the NRA, they want to allow concealed weapons on college campuses. It is extremely difficult to imagine a more stupid idea. They actually want to allow young college students, who are already prone to too much booze and dope, to have lethal weapons available.
Talk about a recipe for immediate chaos!
I can see the headlines in the Daily Tarheel: Gunfight at the Old Well. 2:00 PM every afternoon, M-F. . Come early, bring a blanket or a beach chair.
Note: The university is not responsible for accidental gun wounds to the spectators.
GO GREEN! RECYCLE CONGRESS!
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Charities
The US Post Office wanted to eliminate Saturday regular mail deliveries. I was totally in favor of that, but for a very selfish reason. On the average, I receive 2.5 solicitations per day from various so-called charitable organizations. That means I throw away (to our land-fill) an average of 2.5 pieces of junk mail. Eliminating Saturday deliveries would mean I have to do this only 5 days per week, although the Monday cache would be double. That's a small price to pay in order to help the Postal Service save a little money. On occasion I can give the Postal Service a little business. Whenever some so-called charity sends me a pitiful plea for money, and includes a postage-paid envelope, I immediately mail back to them all the paper they sent me, with a note to put this in their land-fill.
I am retired US Navy, a veteran. I found out that once you give money to one veterans' organization, you are immediately besieged with pleas from dozens of other so-called veterans' groups. I found, to my amazement, there are groups supposedly helping Paralyzed Veterans, Deaf Veterans, Blind Veterans, Wounded Veterans, Homesick Veterans, Unhappy Veterans, Out-of-work Veterans and probably many others. Using a program such as Charity Navigator, it is easy to check these groups. There you will find that most of these spend 65-75% of their total revenue on fund raising. These groups don't do their own fund-raising. They contract with one of the big national companies that do this to make money. So the charity spends some 15-20% of total revenue on their programs. When you give a donation to these groups, you are not supporting some veterans group. You are helping a big fund raising company make money.
Another interesting thing that Charity Navigator will show you is the salaries paid to the officers of these groups. Apparently this is a nice way to make a living. Even more interesting are the "family groups." I found one where the Board of Directors consisted on a Mother, her two sons and her daughter-in-law. This isn't a charity, it's a family business!
I recently received a pitiful plea from an American-Indian school in South Dakota. How did these people got my name and address? Easy! These big fund raising organizations consider your name and address to be common property, to be used wherever they want to use it. If you would like to see proof of this, give a small donation to some obscure group, but use a fictitious first name. I like to use Alphonso. Then sit back and keep count of how many pleas come addressed to that name.
Annually I give a substantial amount to legitimate charities, but I do this at the end of the year. I just have to put up with the constant barrage of pleas during the year. One of the worst culprits is the Salvation Army. Last year I kept a count, and realized I received 18 pleas during that year, that's 1.5 per month. Maybe if they didn't spend so much on fund-raising, they would have more for their programs.
Are any of these scams? Yes, Charity Navigator has reported a couple that could be so considered.
Support local charities. That way, you can have some indication of how your money was used.
I am retired US Navy, a veteran. I found out that once you give money to one veterans' organization, you are immediately besieged with pleas from dozens of other so-called veterans' groups. I found, to my amazement, there are groups supposedly helping Paralyzed Veterans, Deaf Veterans, Blind Veterans, Wounded Veterans, Homesick Veterans, Unhappy Veterans, Out-of-work Veterans and probably many others. Using a program such as Charity Navigator, it is easy to check these groups. There you will find that most of these spend 65-75% of their total revenue on fund raising. These groups don't do their own fund-raising. They contract with one of the big national companies that do this to make money. So the charity spends some 15-20% of total revenue on their programs. When you give a donation to these groups, you are not supporting some veterans group. You are helping a big fund raising company make money.
Another interesting thing that Charity Navigator will show you is the salaries paid to the officers of these groups. Apparently this is a nice way to make a living. Even more interesting are the "family groups." I found one where the Board of Directors consisted on a Mother, her two sons and her daughter-in-law. This isn't a charity, it's a family business!
I recently received a pitiful plea from an American-Indian school in South Dakota. How did these people got my name and address? Easy! These big fund raising organizations consider your name and address to be common property, to be used wherever they want to use it. If you would like to see proof of this, give a small donation to some obscure group, but use a fictitious first name. I like to use Alphonso. Then sit back and keep count of how many pleas come addressed to that name.
Annually I give a substantial amount to legitimate charities, but I do this at the end of the year. I just have to put up with the constant barrage of pleas during the year. One of the worst culprits is the Salvation Army. Last year I kept a count, and realized I received 18 pleas during that year, that's 1.5 per month. Maybe if they didn't spend so much on fund-raising, they would have more for their programs.
Are any of these scams? Yes, Charity Navigator has reported a couple that could be so considered.
Support local charities. That way, you can have some indication of how your money was used.
Thursday, April 04, 2013
DOMA must go!
I said I would stay out of this one, but I cannot stand aside and watch these idiotic ding-bats destroy our beloved country.
As a military veteran, I can understand some problems that the general population may not see. Here is one example.
A military person on active duty is stationed in New York. He/She is legally married to his/her partner. If something happens to the principal, his/her partner is a surviving dependent, with the prescribed privileges and benefits. They have the exact same legal status as any other married couple.
Now, the military member receives orders to the Artillery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Like any other married couple, they pack up and head for the new duty station. But, as soon as they cross the state line into Oklahoma, they are no longer considered to be married. If they had a car wreck and the principal was killed, the surviving partner would not be considered as a surviving dependent, under Oklahoma law. Now, the state of Oklahoma is about as backwards and out-of-step as it is possible to be, but the same problem exists in many other states.
This is ludicrous! What happened to the concept of equal right?
DOMA must go!
As a military veteran, I can understand some problems that the general population may not see. Here is one example.
A military person on active duty is stationed in New York. He/She is legally married to his/her partner. If something happens to the principal, his/her partner is a surviving dependent, with the prescribed privileges and benefits. They have the exact same legal status as any other married couple.
Now, the military member receives orders to the Artillery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Like any other married couple, they pack up and head for the new duty station. But, as soon as they cross the state line into Oklahoma, they are no longer considered to be married. If they had a car wreck and the principal was killed, the surviving partner would not be considered as a surviving dependent, under Oklahoma law. Now, the state of Oklahoma is about as backwards and out-of-step as it is possible to be, but the same problem exists in many other states.
This is ludicrous! What happened to the concept of equal right?
DOMA must go!
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Random musings
We are really going to get a break this year. We won't have to go to the circus to be entertained. We can just watch our state legislature in action, and be totally amused. That is, if we don't cry instead.
While almost any other legislative body would be concentrating on some major problems, such as unemployment, budget deficits, health care costs, immigration or many other concerns, our distinguished body here in North Carolina seems to be more concerned with another major, major problem. Of course I am referring to "nipples." Apparently some of our esteemed legislators are convinced that if a woman's nipple is seen in public, this will surely lead to major social unrest, mass riots and possibly the demise of civilization as we know it.
This entire fiasco has its roots in a topless demonstration held in Asheville. I don't know what that demonstration was about, but who cares? If the ladies want to go topless, be my guest! But, some of these dingbat legislators feel it is imperative that the state do something to stop such sinful behavior. So, they have introduced legislation to make it a felony that's right, a felony under some circumstances to show a bare breast in public. Heavens! What else must we do to keep our society clean and moral?
Can you see the total stupidity in such legislation? First of all, it only applies to women, with one exception for nursing mothers. If the bill ever passed, there would be an immediate court case claiming gender discrimination. I agree! Make the bill apply to men also. They have ugly nipples, and run around bare chested. Also, the proposed bill doesn't set any age limits. Is a two-year girl wearing only a diaper subject to prosecution? When does the horrible sin occur? We've got to be more precise on these things, because there is going to be lots of police action.
The same dingbats who constantly yell that less government is better are who have proposed this legislation to make the state government intervene in everyday life. I wish they would make up their minds. Of course if they did, they would cut out a lot of the comedy.
Go Green! Recycle the Legislature.
While almost any other legislative body would be concentrating on some major problems, such as unemployment, budget deficits, health care costs, immigration or many other concerns, our distinguished body here in North Carolina seems to be more concerned with another major, major problem. Of course I am referring to "nipples." Apparently some of our esteemed legislators are convinced that if a woman's nipple is seen in public, this will surely lead to major social unrest, mass riots and possibly the demise of civilization as we know it.
This entire fiasco has its roots in a topless demonstration held in Asheville. I don't know what that demonstration was about, but who cares? If the ladies want to go topless, be my guest! But, some of these dingbat legislators feel it is imperative that the state do something to stop such sinful behavior. So, they have introduced legislation to make it a felony that's right, a felony under some circumstances to show a bare breast in public. Heavens! What else must we do to keep our society clean and moral?
Can you see the total stupidity in such legislation? First of all, it only applies to women, with one exception for nursing mothers. If the bill ever passed, there would be an immediate court case claiming gender discrimination. I agree! Make the bill apply to men also. They have ugly nipples, and run around bare chested. Also, the proposed bill doesn't set any age limits. Is a two-year girl wearing only a diaper subject to prosecution? When does the horrible sin occur? We've got to be more precise on these things, because there is going to be lots of police action.
The same dingbats who constantly yell that less government is better are who have proposed this legislation to make the state government intervene in everyday life. I wish they would make up their minds. Of course if they did, they would cut out a lot of the comedy.
Go Green! Recycle the Legislature.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Gun control
Today I watched a totally preposterous speech/sermon/diatribe by Wayne Lapieere of the NRA. This performance was insulting to any intelligent person.
I won't take the weeks necessary to refute all the stupid statements he made, but instead merely point out a few of the omissions.
He was not very specific. For example, he wants armed guards at all schools. Does he really mean all? All elementary schools? All middle schools? All high schools? Public schools only? How about private schools or charter schools? Do church schools qualify? What about day-care? That's a type of school.
Why do we stop there? What about colleges and universities? Trade schools? Community colleges? What about the military academies?
He left out a few other places where his logic dictates that we need armed guards. What about movie theaters? Shopping malls? Subway stations? Oh yes, what about military bases, like Ft Bliss? Surely there were some armed personnel there. Didn't help.
If nothing else, this would certainly solve the unemployment problem, as we will need many thousand armed guards. That is, if we want to become an armed, everyone carry your six-shooter (or Uzi) society.
Guns don't kill people.
People kill people
WITH GUNS!
I won't take the weeks necessary to refute all the stupid statements he made, but instead merely point out a few of the omissions.
He was not very specific. For example, he wants armed guards at all schools. Does he really mean all? All elementary schools? All middle schools? All high schools? Public schools only? How about private schools or charter schools? Do church schools qualify? What about day-care? That's a type of school.
Why do we stop there? What about colleges and universities? Trade schools? Community colleges? What about the military academies?
He left out a few other places where his logic dictates that we need armed guards. What about movie theaters? Shopping malls? Subway stations? Oh yes, what about military bases, like Ft Bliss? Surely there were some armed personnel there. Didn't help.
If nothing else, this would certainly solve the unemployment problem, as we will need many thousand armed guards. That is, if we want to become an armed, everyone carry your six-shooter (or Uzi) society.
Guns don't kill people.
People kill people
WITH GUNS!
Saturday, December 01, 2012
Post election hangover
The election hangover.
I had hoped that by now, the dingbats would accept the fact
that they lost, put it behind them, and get down to business. I was wrong. But at least it has been
interesting to see how much they had believed their own spin, and were
convinced they would win handily. They
were shocked at the results. All those
millions spent and for what? A rousing
defeat.
It has been educational to follow the sequence. First was the denial, as the big dogs could
not bring themselves to admit they lost. They just could not accept the fact
that a majority of voters didn’t like their programs, philosophy and attitude.
Second came the search for excuses for why they lost. Something or somebody had to carry the
blame. Over the next weeks following the
election, we heard several excuses: it
was Hurricane Sandy; or it was a conspiracy among the Latinos and the Blacks,
somehow fomented by President Obama; or it was fraudulent votes in every state
the President won, especially on early or absentee ballots; or the President
bought the election by giving away entitlements, such as Medicare and Social
Security; or something similar. It became rather comical to see the big dogs
stand before the Fox cameras, and proclaim how the evil Democrats had somehow
been better at stealing votes than they were.
But, to me, the funniest was how they tried to pillory
Governor Christie, and actually blame him for their loss. Governor Christie, of course, was doing the
job he had been elected to perform. But,
the dingbats accused him of committing high crimes and misdemeanors, for which
he should be excommunicated from the party, and probably hung at high
noon. What were the horrible crimes he
committed? He stood too close to
President Obama on the airport tarmac, and GASP! dared to ride in the President’s
helicopter while they surveyed the damage from Sandy. I must admit this one was hard to
believe. I couldn’t imagine even the
dingbats being so callous, mean, fault-finding and downright stupid.
Now, round 2 begins as we fight over “the cliff!” Make your bets now. My prediction is that
there will be an awful lot of lies told between now and December 31.
The other side show is how Sen. McCain and his merry band
have decided to attack Susan Rice, the assumed nominee for Secretary of
State. Her crime: she appeared before
the UN and made a statement, based on the information available, that was later
proven to be untrue. To the dingbats,
this was another vile conspiracy to do something or the other. They conveniently forget that Colin Powell did
the same thing just before the Iraqi invasion.
Isn’t that strange?
Sunday, November 11, 2012
The Election of 2012
Some musings about the election
This last election set many records.
Most money spent during a campaign.
Most lies told during a campaign.
Most number of losers who were convinced they were winning
until the results began to come in.
The election left many questions unanswered:
How does Karl Rove explain to his angels that he spend $690
million
and got nobody
elected?
What does Paul Ryan do now?
He’s like an evangelist without
a congregation.
What does Mitt Romney do?
Can he go back to one of his many estates
and putter around in the garden? Poor guy only has around $500 million
to live on. Of course, some of the more irreverent pundits
claim the only
reason he was running for President was so he could add that
to his resume,
in case he wants to
run for the office of God.
Do you suppose the leaders of the dingbats have finally
figured out that if
they try to disenfranchise a bloc of voters, and failing
that, just totally ignore
that bloc, then that bloc will vote against them? We have a couple of
examples of this.
A bunch of the losers should have heeded the old adage: “Beware the woman
scorned, lovely in her wrath.” I wonder how many members of the
“rape team”
are sleeping on the couch because the bedroom door is locked?
Can you believe it” Some are already pontificating about the
2016 election.
Please. Give us a break! We have enough problems to worry about.
Labels:
campaign money,
dingbats,
election
Friday, October 19, 2012
I voted early
I have a confession to make.
For many years now, I have prided myself that I never voted a “straight
ticket” in any election. I mean this
seriously, not like a former professor back in Oklahoma who used to brag that
he always voted for the Republican candidate for Assistant Mine Inspector.
No, I have always considered the person, and ignored the
party label. In many cases, down at the
county or township level, a party label didn't mean anything. Integrity and honesty were the compelling
factors.
I have voted early. This year, I broke with my
long-established policy. There is no way
I could vote for a Republican candidate for any office at any level. Democrats, Libertarians, Progressive, what
have you, could get my vote, but no Republicans.
I did not make this decision lightly. But among the many sins a politician can
commit, lying to me is right at the top of the no-no list. Over the past four years, I have been bombarded
with lies, half-truths, statements taken totally out of context, skewed facts,
or just plain stupidly incorrect allegations.
The barrage is unending.
Each day, in the mail, I receive 2-3 fliers from the Republican
Party. Every one contains at least one
blatant lie. It is an insult to my intelligence. I read, I listen, I watch. I know what is going on in the world. My anger gets cranked up when some dingbat
politician stand in front of the TV cameras and states something totally wrong,
but when challenged with facts, just continues with the same lie. The Republican Party philosophy seems to be
“tell a lie enough times and the public will eventually believe it.”
Think back to 2009.
Then we had the “birthers”, who refuse to go away. Then, a year later, we had the “deathers.”
This year we had the “jobbers.” These
people just can’t give up. Everything
must be the result of a vast conspiracy. And all their complicated arguments
are but lies.
The Republican Party sold out to the Religious Right many
years back. Now they are even further
driven by the Tea Baggers, big oil, big coal, Wall Street and several other
true fanatics. These people have
convinced me that they are not interested in solving America’s problems. They are interested only in furthering their
own narrow interests, to hell with the people. It is not only at the national
level that we see these self-centered interests. No, it is also at the state,
county and even city level that we see Republican politicians who answer only
to their masters, and ignore the people. Enough is enough!
One note about the VP debate. While watching it occurred to me that we are
but one catastrophe away from having one of these men assume the office of President,
and Commander-in-Chief. Which one would
you trust to lead America?
Labels:
2012 elections,
dingbat stupidity,
liars,
vote
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Dingbat stupidity
Dear Mitt: I am a lazy, entitled freeloader. By your definition, and apparently your program, I should be left by the side of the road to beg for my subsistence.
I am retired from the US Navy. That means I draw retirement pay. This was a contractual thing. When I joined the Navy, I agreed to put myself in harm's way to protect other Americans, like you. In return, the Navy promised to pay me retirement pay when my tour of service was over. What exactly do you find wrong with that, Mitt? Why does that make me a freeloader? I fulfilled my part of the contract. The Navy is fulfilling theirs.
After I retired, I did not become a 100% parasite on society, as you imply. No, I taught at a Community College for many years. I retired from that also, and draw retirement pay. Again, this was guaranteed by my employment contract. Does that make me a freeloader? I did my part and the sate is doing theirs.
I also draw Social Security. I paid into the system for many, many years. Now the government is fulfilling their promise to me. Does that make me a freeloader? You seem to have a problem with this, Mitt.
Oh, yes, Mitt. Let's look at some other things. By implication, you lump me into a nebulous group who you claim are totally dependent on the government. Well, Mitt, I'll make you a bet. I bet you that I pay a higher percentage of my income as income tax than you do.
Think about that, Mitt. There's a hell of a lot of people who pay a higher percentage than you do. All these people are not afraid to disclose their tax returns. We're still waiting to see yours, Mitt.
Mitt, you do have one thing correct. I will most certainly, and with great pleasure, vote for anyone running against you for any office.
I am retired from the US Navy. That means I draw retirement pay. This was a contractual thing. When I joined the Navy, I agreed to put myself in harm's way to protect other Americans, like you. In return, the Navy promised to pay me retirement pay when my tour of service was over. What exactly do you find wrong with that, Mitt? Why does that make me a freeloader? I fulfilled my part of the contract. The Navy is fulfilling theirs.
After I retired, I did not become a 100% parasite on society, as you imply. No, I taught at a Community College for many years. I retired from that also, and draw retirement pay. Again, this was guaranteed by my employment contract. Does that make me a freeloader? I did my part and the sate is doing theirs.
I also draw Social Security. I paid into the system for many, many years. Now the government is fulfilling their promise to me. Does that make me a freeloader? You seem to have a problem with this, Mitt.
Oh, yes, Mitt. Let's look at some other things. By implication, you lump me into a nebulous group who you claim are totally dependent on the government. Well, Mitt, I'll make you a bet. I bet you that I pay a higher percentage of my income as income tax than you do.
Think about that, Mitt. There's a hell of a lot of people who pay a higher percentage than you do. All these people are not afraid to disclose their tax returns. We're still waiting to see yours, Mitt.
Mitt, you do have one thing correct. I will most certainly, and with great pleasure, vote for anyone running against you for any office.
Labels:
dingbats,
freeloader,
republicans,
taxes
Friday, August 31, 2012
Big Lies
Fractured Factualities
The dingbat
convention is finally over. It seems
like it lasted three weeks, because it should take that long to get all the
lies told. I’m sorry, it is no longer
politically correct to use that term.
What we have experienced are “fractured factualities.” Isn’t that better?
Actually I
watched perhaps 5 minutes of the entire convention. There were two reasons for my refusal to
listen to the gibberish. First, I knew
that if I listened/watched this circus,
I would get totally PO’d at all the lies.
Sorry, there’s that word again.
Secondly, the US Open was being televised, and to me, that was a hell of
a lot more honest.
One time
before the convention, while listening to some dingbats orating about their
plan, whatever that is, I started to write down all the lies I heard. Unfortunately I soon ran out of paper. But,
there were a few that I remember.
First, Lush
Limbaugh, the darling of the teabaggers, stated that the Obama Administration
was falsifying the data to make it appear that Hurricane Isaac would hit Tampa,
and thereby cancel the convention. This is so ridiculous it is funny! Anyone who has watched the Weather Channel
remembers them showing all the possible tracks generated by the computer
models. Yes, some of these “possible”
tracks went over Tampa. Others predicted other paths, including the one
actually taken. But the Lush claims this
was all a conspiracy. Can you imagine how many people would be
required to falsify the satellite pictures and the radar images to back up his
conspiracy theory? But, there are people
out there who believe every lie he tells.
That’s what is frightening!
Second, a
dingbat politician from Oklahoma claims that “global warming” is just a hoax,
perpetuated by the Obama administration.
Do you suppose he really means that all those icecaps melting in
Greenland are just a figment of our imagination? Some people just cannot accept the
truth.
Third, one imminent
dingbat politician made a reference to “Obama’s Afghan War.” I’m sorry, but I was awake and sober during
those years, and I’m sure this war started in 2006 or maybe even before. President Obama wasn’t elected until
2008. If we have a President who can
start a war before he is even elected, then he has exceptional powers, and we
better keep him.
But from
listening to and reading the blathering pronouncements by the dingbats, I think
I have possibly uncovered parts of their platform, such as it is. I think they want:
Less
government, except when we have a flood, hurricane or tornado when more
government aid is required;
A larger
military establishment, which is rather confusing since the military is usually
considered part of the government;
A couple of
more wars, since we are only fighting 2 at the moment;
Less money
spent on education, except we need to teach more “creationism” in the schools;
Less
regulation and control of the banking industry since they (the banking
industry) have promised they will not take us into another recession unless
they find another really good sounding but totally stupid way to lose
billions;
Less control
and regulation of big business, thus creating a “trickle-down” of benefits to
the middle class (in China, India, Brazil, etc.)
Gender and
racial equality: This is difficult to
decipher, but I think they want:
African-Americans:
back to the cotton patch;
Latinos:
back to Mexico;
Women: back to the 1920’s. Their motto seems to be “Women’s place is in
the kitchen, and she should go there immediately after work.”
But then
that is my understanding of the current political climate. You are invited to create your own.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
More Dingbat politics
Dingbat
Political Lies (often disguised as ads)
As I watch the political ads on TV, and listen to radio/TV
interviews, I am convinced there is no limit to the nonfactual statements, twisting
of the truth or outright lies pronounced by the dingbats.
However, I am waiting for the ultimate TV ad You know the one, you see it every day as
some marketing firm tries to sell you a super deal on some useless gadget. Here is what I think will be the dingbat
version.
Now, for the first time on TV, the RNC Corporation is
giving you this opportunity to own your own dingbat political slate. If you order today, we will send you Mitt
Romney AND Paul Ryan for only three easy payments $78 billion. AMAZING!
This offer is not available in stores.
BUT WAIT! THERE’S MORE! If you
order within the next hour, we will double your order. THAT’S RIGHT!
We will send you two Mitt Romneys and two Paul Ryans. Just pay separate shipping and handling. But
call this number now. 888-BIG-SCAM. That’s 888-BIG-SCAM. Call now!
Friday, June 29, 2012
The dingbats have me confused
I need some help here. I realize my memory is not that good anymore, but I am certain that Mitt Romney was the Governor of Massachusetts not too many years ago. While he was Governor the state enacted a very comprehensive health care law. At its passage, Mitt declared that legislation as being the greatest thing since sliced bread, or something to that effect.
Now, Mitts seems to forget, ignore, pretend not or deny that he was ever the Governor. He also states that the so-called Obama-care, which is closely patterned after the Massachusetts plan, is "evil incarnate", the worst thing since Adam pulled a scam on Eve.
Now, this is confusing to me. Tthe same arguments Mitt was using to support the Massachusetts health plan enacted while he was Governor (if he ever was the Governor) he is now trying to use against Obama-care.
Do you see why I am confused? Was he the Governor? Did they pass a health plan? Did he support it? Or is this all just a figment of my imagination?
Of course by tomorrow this may all be a moot point. Mitt has rather accurately been described as the "weather vane candidate". If you don't like what he seems to believe, just wait a bit. He'll probably change to your satisfaction.
In the interim, somebody please explain to me exactly what is happening.
Now, Mitts seems to forget, ignore, pretend not or deny that he was ever the Governor. He also states that the so-called Obama-care, which is closely patterned after the Massachusetts plan, is "evil incarnate", the worst thing since Adam pulled a scam on Eve.
Now, this is confusing to me. Tthe same arguments Mitt was using to support the Massachusetts health plan enacted while he was Governor (if he ever was the Governor) he is now trying to use against Obama-care.
Do you see why I am confused? Was he the Governor? Did they pass a health plan? Did he support it? Or is this all just a figment of my imagination?
Of course by tomorrow this may all be a moot point. Mitt has rather accurately been described as the "weather vane candidate". If you don't like what he seems to believe, just wait a bit. He'll probably change to your satisfaction.
In the interim, somebody please explain to me exactly what is happening.
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Dingbat Lies
The dingbats are at it again. I keep thinking we have finally seen the
ultimate in low-down, dirty politics but they are super resourceful. No matters how big a lie, or how dirty a
tactic, they always manage to top it.
Now they want to revive the “birther” ploy. These people just won’t accept the
truth. My God, so far we have seen the
long form and the short form of President Obama’s birth certificate, all
certified, verified and confirmed! He
was born in Hawaii. His Mother was an
American citizen, therefore he is an American citizen. End of discussion.
But no, now a functionary in Arizona tried to demand that he
personally must be provided with a certified copy, sworn to and affirmed by
everybody above the rank of traffic patrolman or he, the functionary, will not
put President Obama’s name on the ballot.
Can you comprehend the audacity of this?
They have even brought back Donald Trump from wherever he has been
hiding. Of course they want his money
(although they certainly haven’t received any of the big bucks yet) so they are
willing to showcase him and let him bleat like a lovesick cow about the great
conspiracy to disguise the birthplace.
George Will, the noted Conservative columnist, with whom I seldom agree,
had it exactly right with his description of Trump as a “blithering idiot.”
The lies continue.
Now they claim that the Obama administration is spending more than any
administration in history. That is a
lie! Actual spending is lower now. But to the dingbats, truth is a rather
nebulous entity. Remember back in the
early days of the primary when one candidate made a totally false
statement? When the press caught him out
on this, his staff tried to pass it off by saying “it was not meant to be a
factual statement.” No, it was meant to
be a lie!
I have tried mightily to propose logical explanations for the
continuing actions by the dingbats, but more and more I am resigned to one
simple reason. It is nothing more than
pure racial bigotry. There is a black
man in the white house and they just can’t stand this, so they are willing to
take the entire US down to catastrophe to achieve their goal of “racial
purity.” Sounds like something from Nazi
Germany.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)